Automox vs Ivanti Neurons for Patch — 2026 comparison
A side-by-side look at how Automox and Ivanti Neurons for Patch compare on score, real user ratings, pricing and features.
vs
The verdict
Automox and Ivanti Neurons for Patch are both Patch Management Software options worth comparing. Automox ranks higher in our editorial score (85 vs 78 out of 100). Automox has the larger review base (434 reviews across 2 sources). Automox is best for cloud-first teams patching cross-OS without on-prem; Ivanti Neurons for Patch is best for enterprises wanting risk-based patch prioritization. Starting price: Automox From $1/endpoint/mo, Ivanti Neurons for Patch Custom quote. See the full breakdown below, then read each review before you decide.
Pick Automox if…cloud-first teams patching cross-OS without on-prem
Pick Ivanti Neurons for Patch if…enterprises wanting risk-based patch prioritization
Side by side
| Automox | Ivanti Neurons for Patch | |
|---|---|---|
| Our score | 85/100 | 78/100 |
| User consensus | 4.6/5 (434) | 4.0/5 (1) |
| Starting price | From $1/endpoint/mo | Custom quote |
| Best for | cloud-first teams patching cross-OS without on-prem | enterprises wanting risk-based patch prioritization |
| Cross-OS (Win/Mac/Linux) | ||
| Third-party app patching | ||
| Cloud / no-VPN remote | ◑ | |
| Automation & scripting | ||
| Compliance reporting | ◑ | |
| Free tier or trial | – | – |
Automox
- Cloud-native cross-platform patching with reusable automation
- Lightweight agent, fast setup and responsive support
- – No solution for on-prem/air-gapped devices; no MDM
- – Limited reporting/integrations and occasional patch-status issues
Ivanti Neurons for Patch
- Enterprise risk-based patch prioritization with device risk visibility
- Broad platform coverage and SCCM/endpoint-manager integration
- – Complex UI with a steep learning curve
- – Occasional stability and performance issues reported