Automox vs NinjaOne — 2026 comparison
A side-by-side look at how Automox and NinjaOne compare on score, real user ratings, pricing and features.
vs
The verdict
Automox and NinjaOne are both Patch Management Software options worth comparing. NinjaOne ranks higher in our editorial score (86 vs 85 out of 100). NinjaOne has the larger review base (4,682 reviews across 2 sources). Automox is best for cloud-first teams patching cross-OS without on-prem; NinjaOne is best for MSPs and IT teams wanting patching in a unified endpoint platform. Starting price: Automox From $1/endpoint/mo, NinjaOne Custom quote (~$1.50–$4/device/mo). See the full breakdown below, then read each review before you decide.
Pick Automox if…cloud-first teams patching cross-OS without on-prem
Pick NinjaOne if…MSPs and IT teams wanting patching in a unified endpoint platform
Side by side
| Automox | NinjaOne | |
|---|---|---|
| Our score | 85/100 | 86/100 |
| User consensus | 4.6/5 (434) | 4.7/5 (4,682) |
| Starting price | From $1/endpoint/mo | Custom quote (~$1.50–$4/device/mo) |
| Best for | cloud-first teams patching cross-OS without on-prem | MSPs and IT teams wanting patching in a unified endpoint platform |
| Cross-OS (Win/Mac/Linux) | ||
| Third-party app patching | ||
| Cloud / no-VPN remote | ||
| Automation & scripting | ||
| Compliance reporting | ◑ | ◑ |
| Free tier or trial | – | – |
Automox
- Cloud-native cross-platform patching with reusable automation
- Lightweight agent, fast setup and responsive support
- – No solution for on-prem/air-gapped devices; no MDM
- – Limited reporting/integrations and occasional patch-status issues
NinjaOne
- Clean, intuitive dashboard with reliable automated patching
- Fast built-in remote access plus strong automation and support
- – Pricing can be costly and can escalate without monitoring
- – Reporting customization is limited; initial setup takes effort