Ivanti Neurons for Patch vs PDQ — 2026 comparison
A side-by-side look at how Ivanti Neurons for Patch and PDQ compare on score, real user ratings, pricing and features.
vs
The verdict
Ivanti Neurons for Patch and PDQ are both Patch Management Software options worth comparing. PDQ ranks higher in our editorial score (87 vs 78 out of 100). PDQ has the larger review base (615 reviews across 2 sources). Ivanti Neurons for Patch is best for enterprises wanting risk-based patch prioritization; PDQ is best for Windows-centric shops wanting affordable, powerful deployment. Starting price: Ivanti Neurons for Patch Custom quote, PDQ From ~$1,650/admin/yr (or $12/device/yr cloud). See the full breakdown below, then read each review before you decide.
Pick Ivanti Neurons for Patch if…enterprises wanting risk-based patch prioritization
Pick PDQ if…Windows-centric shops wanting affordable, powerful deployment
Side by side
| Ivanti Neurons for Patch | PDQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Our score | 78/100 | 87/100 |
| User consensus | 4.0/5 (1) | 4.8/5 (615) |
| Starting price | Custom quote | From ~$1,650/admin/yr (or $12/device/yr cloud) |
| Best for | enterprises wanting risk-based patch prioritization | Windows-centric shops wanting affordable, powerful deployment |
| Cross-OS (Win/Mac/Linux) | – | |
| Third-party app patching | ||
| Cloud / no-VPN remote | ◑ | ◑ |
| Automation & scripting | ||
| Compliance reporting | ◑ | |
| Free tier or trial | – | – |
Ivanti Neurons for Patch
- Enterprise risk-based patch prioritization with device risk visibility
- Broad platform coverage and SCCM/endpoint-manager integration
- – Complex UI with a steep learning curve
- – Occasional stability and performance issues reported
PDQ
- Easy to use and affordable with a large pre-built package library
- Deploy and Inventory work tightly together with dynamic collections
- – On-prem and Windows-centric; remote/off-network devices need a VPN
- – Learning curve for advanced reporting and scan profiles