Bullhorn vs Tracker — 2026 comparison
A side-by-side look at how Bullhorn and Tracker compare on score, real user ratings, pricing and features.
vs
The verdict
Bullhorn and Tracker are both Staffing Agency Software options worth comparing. Tracker ranks higher in our editorial score (90 vs 82 out of 100). Bullhorn has the larger review base (1,023 reviews across 1 sources). Bullhorn is best for large staffing firms scaling operations; Tracker is best for small-to-mid staffing agencies wanting an all-in-one. Starting price: Bullhorn Custom quote, Tracker From $80/user/mo. See the full breakdown below, then read each review before you decide.
Pick Bullhorn if…large staffing firms scaling operations
Pick Tracker if…small-to-mid staffing agencies wanting an all-in-one
Side by side
| Bullhorn | Tracker | |
|---|---|---|
| Our score | 82/100 | 90/100 |
| User consensus | 4.0/5 (1,023) | 4.7/5 (186) |
| Starting price | Custom quote | From $80/user/mo |
| Best for | large staffing firms scaling operations | small-to-mid staffing agencies wanting an all-in-one |
| ATS & sourcing | ||
| Client CRM & jobs | ||
| Placements & contracts | ||
| Timesheets & pay/bill | ◑ | ◑ |
| Job-board integrations | ||
| Reporting & analytics |
Bullhorn
- Deep candidate management with strong job-board integrations like LinkedIn and Indeed
- Highly customizable with robust reporting for staffing workflows
- – High overall cost with pricey add-ons and frequent billing complaints
- – Mobile app and search functionality rated poorly by users
Tracker
- Highly customizable workflows with excellent, responsive customer support
- Strong Outlook integration and solid reporting for recruiting and sales pipelines
- – Learning curve for the more advanced features
- – Reporting and email functionality could be more user-friendly