Microsoft Viva vs Staffbase — 2026 comparison
A side-by-side look at how Microsoft Viva and Staffbase compare on score, real user ratings, pricing and features.
vs
The verdict
Microsoft Viva and Staffbase are both Intranet Software options worth comparing. Staffbase ranks higher in our editorial score (85 vs 80 out of 100). Microsoft Viva has the larger review base (819 reviews across 1 sources). Microsoft Viva is best for microsoft 365 shops standardizing on teams; Staffbase is best for mobile-first internal communications. Starting price: Microsoft Viva From $12/user/mo, Staffbase Custom quote. See the full breakdown below, then read each review before you decide.
Pick Microsoft Viva if…microsoft 365 shops standardizing on teams
Pick Staffbase if…mobile-first internal communications
Side by side
| Microsoft Viva | Staffbase | |
|---|---|---|
| Our score | 80/100 | 85/100 |
| User consensus | 4.2/5 (819) | 4.6/5 (328) |
| Starting price | From $12/user/mo | Custom quote |
| Best for | microsoft 365 shops standardizing on teams | mobile-first internal communications |
| News/publishing | ||
| Document library & search | ◑ | |
| People directory | ◑ | |
| Mobile app | ||
| Engagement analytics | ||
| M365/Google integration |
Microsoft Viva
- Deep native integration with Microsoft 365, SharePoint, and Teams
- Familiar and low-cost add-on for existing Microsoft customers
- – Experience is fragmented across several separate modules
- – Building a polished intranet requires SharePoint expertise
Staffbase
- Clean, intuitive interface that employees adopt with little training
- Mobile-first design reaches deskless and frontline staff effectively
- – Back-end administration can be unintuitive and hard to learn
- – Costs are high and geared toward larger enterprises