Hippo CMMS vs MaintainX — 2026 comparison
A side-by-side look at how Hippo CMMS and MaintainX compare on score, real user ratings, pricing and features.
vs
The verdict
Hippo CMMS and MaintainX are both CMMS Software options worth comparing. MaintainX ranks higher in our editorial score (91 vs 78 out of 100). MaintainX has the larger review base (2,590 reviews across 2 sources). Hippo CMMS is best for small facilities wanting simple asset maps; MaintainX is best for mobile work orders on the shop floor. Starting price: Hippo CMMS Custom quote, MaintainX Free; paid from $20/user/mo. See the full breakdown below, then read each review before you decide.
Pick Hippo CMMS if…small facilities wanting simple asset maps
Pick MaintainX if…mobile work orders on the shop floor
Side by side
| Hippo CMMS | MaintainX | |
|---|---|---|
| Our score | 78/100 | 91/100 |
| User consensus | 1.7/5 (105) | 4.8/5 (2,590) |
| Starting price | Custom quote | Free; paid from $20/user/mo |
| Best for | small facilities wanting simple asset maps | mobile work orders on the shop floor |
| Preventive maintenance | ||
| Work orders (mobile) | ||
| Asset registry & history | ||
| Parts/inventory | ||
| Reporting/KPIs | ◑ | |
| Public pricing | – |
Hippo CMMS
- Simple, visual interface with interactive floor-plan and equipment maps
- Praised for helpful customer service and easy database setup
- – Reporting and customization options are relatively limited
- – Now folded into Eptura, leaving its standalone future uncertain
MaintainX
- Very easy to use for both work requesters and full technicians
- Fast setup with minimal training and a strong mobile experience
- – Per-user cost adds up quickly at the premium tiers
- – Several advanced features are gated behind higher-priced plans