Ashby vs Greenhouse — 2026 comparison
A side-by-side look at how Ashby and Greenhouse compare on score, real user ratings, pricing and features.
vs
The verdict
Ashby and Greenhouse are both ATS Software options worth comparing. Ashby ranks higher in our editorial score (88 vs 85 out of 100). Greenhouse has the larger review base (764 reviews across 1 sources). Ashby is best for data-driven startups scaling their recruiting; Greenhouse is best for structured hiring at scaling and larger orgs. Starting price: Ashby From $300/mo, Greenhouse Custom quote. See the full breakdown below, then read each review before you decide.
Pick Ashby if…data-driven startups scaling their recruiting
Pick Greenhouse if…structured hiring at scaling and larger orgs
Side by side
| Ashby | Greenhouse | |
|---|---|---|
| Our score | 88/100 | 85/100 |
| User consensus | 4.5/5 (13) | 4.5/5 (764) |
| Starting price | From $300/mo | Custom quote |
| Best for | data-driven startups scaling their recruiting | structured hiring at scaling and larger orgs |
| Job posting & careers page | ||
| Candidate pipeline/CRM | ||
| Interview scheduling & scorecards | ||
| Collaboration & approvals | ||
| Recruiting analytics | ||
| Job-board/HRIS integrations |
Ashby
- Reporting and analytics dashboards reviewers rate above other ATS platforms
- Integrated interview scheduling and customizable feedback rubrics in one place
- – Candidate filtering and discovery can feel limited and manual
- – Full setup is time-intensive to configure
Greenhouse
- Structured hiring with scorecards and interview kits that reduce bias
- Large integration marketplace and responsive, well-rated support
- – Reporting is limited and reviewers call it unintuitive
- – Pricing is steep and quote-only, tough for smaller teams