Greenhouse vs iCIMS — 2026 comparison
A side-by-side look at how Greenhouse and iCIMS compare on score, real user ratings, pricing and features.
vs
The verdict
Greenhouse and iCIMS are both ATS Software options worth comparing. Greenhouse ranks higher in our editorial score (85 vs 80 out of 100). iCIMS has the larger review base (824 reviews across 1 sources). Greenhouse is best for structured hiring at scaling and larger orgs; iCIMS is best for large enterprises with high-volume hiring. Starting price: Greenhouse Custom quote, iCIMS Custom quote. See the full breakdown below, then read each review before you decide.
Pick Greenhouse if…structured hiring at scaling and larger orgs
Pick iCIMS if…large enterprises with high-volume hiring
Side by side
| Greenhouse | iCIMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Our score | 85/100 | 80/100 |
| User consensus | 4.5/5 (764) | 4.3/5 (824) |
| Starting price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Best for | structured hiring at scaling and larger orgs | large enterprises with high-volume hiring |
| Job posting & careers page | ||
| Candidate pipeline/CRM | ||
| Interview scheduling & scorecards | ||
| Collaboration & approvals | ||
| Recruiting analytics | ||
| Job-board/HRIS integrations |
Greenhouse
- Structured hiring with scorecards and interview kits that reduce bias
- Large integration marketplace and responsive, well-rated support
- – Reporting is limited and reviewers call it unintuitive
- – Pricing is steep and quote-only, tough for smaller teams
iCIMS
- Covers the full recruitment lifecycle and handles high-volume hiring
- Customizable workflows, approvals and robust reporting
- – Interface is clunky and overwhelming without heavy training
- – Integrations and premium features carry significant extra fees