Greenhouse vs Workable — 2026 comparison
A side-by-side look at how Greenhouse and Workable compare on score, real user ratings, pricing and features.
vs
The verdict
Greenhouse and Workable are both ATS Software options worth comparing. Workable ranks higher in our editorial score (90 vs 85 out of 100). Greenhouse has the larger review base (764 reviews across 1 sources). Greenhouse is best for structured hiring at scaling and larger orgs; Workable is best for small and mid-sized teams that want it running fast. Starting price: Greenhouse Custom quote, Workable From $189/mo. See the full breakdown below, then read each review before you decide.
Pick Greenhouse if…structured hiring at scaling and larger orgs
Pick Workable if…small and mid-sized teams that want it running fast
Side by side
| Greenhouse | Workable | |
|---|---|---|
| Our score | 85/100 | 90/100 |
| User consensus | 4.5/5 (764) | 4.4/5 (661) |
| Starting price | Custom quote | From $189/mo |
| Best for | structured hiring at scaling and larger orgs | small and mid-sized teams that want it running fast |
| Job posting & careers page | ||
| Candidate pipeline/CRM | ||
| Interview scheduling & scorecards | ||
| Collaboration & approvals | ||
| Recruiting analytics | ◑ | |
| Job-board/HRIS integrations |
Greenhouse
- Structured hiring with scorecards and interview kits that reduce bias
- Large integration marketplace and responsive, well-rated support
- – Reporting is limited and reviewers call it unintuitive
- – Pricing is steep and quote-only, tough for smaller teams
Workable
- Intuitive interface that hiring managers pick up quickly with little training
- Strong automation, scheduling and AI sourcing that cut time-to-fill
- – Native reporting is basic and hard to customize for deeper insight
- – Calendar integration can be unstable for multi-person scheduling